Perks of Being a Wallflower

In the Perks of Being a Wallflower, there are many important symbols. Some of the most important symbols are the drives that Charlie takes. There are a few important scenes where he drives, two while he is with Sam and Patrick, and one where he is alone with his family. Charlie's drives symbolize the journey he has taken growing up, and how he will end up in the right place.

Charlie drives three times throughout the book-twice with Sam, the girl he loves and Patrick, his best guy friend, and once by himself, on his way back from his grandparents house. The first time, he's with his friends, although their friendship is very new. He's pretty unsure of himself and quiet, but he feels like he can open up to them, and he feels happier than he has felt in a long time. It quotes "five minutes of a lifetime were truly spent, and we felt young in a good way." Charlie is learning how to live for the first time, and it's because of the people he is with. The second time, Charlie is driving for his family. They are all in a car together and there is a lot of tension because of a fight they had. Charlie is not the best driver, and he is extremely nervous. It quotes "I haven't sweat that much since I played sports." Charlie is at a very difficult time in his life, and it is not helping that his family isn't able to support him the way he needs. The last time is at the very end of the book, when Charlie has finally started to recover from the traumatic experience he had as a child. He is with Sam and Patrick again, and he is finally happy again. It quotes "I was laughing and crying at the same time...and that was enough to make me feel infinite." He is also driving through a tunnel at this part, which symbolizes "the light at the end of the tunnel."

The drives that Charlie takes symbolize his emotional journey throughout the book. He starts unsure of himself, but gradually starts to accept his feelings and become a happier person.

Gaokao

The gaokao is a very difficult test that students in China take to be accepted into university, similar to the SATs. It causes many students very high stress levels. For some universities, it is the only determining factor on whether or not schools accept a student. I believe that it is unfair for everything to ride on the gaokao, for many reasons.

The first reason that the gaokao is unfair is because it requires vigorous preparation, and many families do not have the means to get that. Wealthy families are able to afford private tutors and classes, so many rich kids can get into prestigious schools. However, many poorer or middle class families are unable to afford that, therefore the kids are unable to get accepted into the schools. It is unfair to less fortunate students who can be extremely smart, but are only being judged on one test and cannot train properly for it.

Another reason the gaokao is unfair is because it puts a lot of pressure onto the teenagers who are taking the test. Students lose a lot of sleep, and are so exhausted that they are forced to take extreme measures, like hooking themselves up to intravenous drips. They are also banned from computers, cell phones, and dating, forcing them to study. The stress is so extreme that  suicide rates tend to go up during the time of the gaokao, which shows that this test is far too hard for students. It is unfair to force teenagers to study so hard for one test, and it is unfair for that one test to determine so much of a student’s life.

Some people argue that the test can be helpful to students who need a last resort to get into university, like students who have failed their classes and cannot be accepted into college on their grades. While the test could definitely be helpful for some students, it should not be the only determining factor for acceptances into college, because some people are very smart, but have trouble with tests.

In conclusion, the gaokao should not be the only determining factor in college acceptances. It is far too stressful, it puts rich kids at an advantage, and it is unfair that this one test should determine students’ whole lives. The gaokao is a very unfair test.

Martin Espada

The three poems by Martin Espada “The new bathroom policy”, “Revolutionary Spanish Lesson”, and “Two Mexicanos” all explore the theme of racism. In each poem something is taken away from Hispanics by Americans. All three poems express the hardships of being Hispanic through different experiences.

The first poem is called “The New Bathroom Policy at English High School”. It goes “The boys chatter Spanish...while the principal listens...the only word he recognizes is his own name...so he decides to ban Spanish. Now he can relax.” This poem explores the theme of racism in simple, everyday life-a non Hispanic principal believes that he is more entitled to comfort then the boys are to their language. This shows how white people believe that their own well being is more important than people of color’s. The principal knew that there was a chance that what they were saying was bad, so he completely took away their rights of expression. This was extremely unjust, and shows how white people believe they are more entitled to their rights then minorities.

The second poem is called “Revolutionary Spanish Lesson”. It goes “Whenever my name is mispronounced I want to hijack a bus of Republican tourists...and force them to chant anti American slogans in Spanish. The Americans are stripping him of his identity and importance by mispronouncing his name, and it makes him angry enough to want to threaten and punish them. He also wants to teach them how it feels to hear their culture being criticized, (wanting to teach them “anti-American slogans”). This shows how furious it makes him to hear his identity be dismissed by people who believe they are better than him. He presents the issue this way because it may seem like a trivial thing, but being stripped of his identity is a big deal for him.

The last poem is called “Two Mexicanos lynched in Santa Cruz, California, May 3, 1877.” It is about the lynching of two Mexicanos by Americans who then took a photograph of themselves behind the men. This poem shows how the Americans dismissed the lives of the two men very easily. It says that they “cheered the rope” that killed them. They did not care that they were taking the lives of the two men. It also says that they were “all crowding into the photograph”. They were not ashamed of the cruel act that they committed, and they even took a picture of it. This poem is about how the lives of people of color matter very little to white people, and they are not at all ashamed to kill them.

All three of these poems show racism. Some of it is seemingly small and unimportant, and some is life threatening. Martin Espada expressed the hardships of being Hispanic through all of these poems, and he showed all the things you can lose because of your identity. As a reader, I have learned to never diminish someones identity because I can’t understand it.

Speak Essay

In the book Speak, one of the most important symbols is the closet that Melinda, the protagonist, spends a lot of her time in. The closet represents Melinda's silence and fear of communication with others, which is why she shuts herself away. However, when Melinda starts to overcome her silence, she clears out the closet and stops hiding. The closet is Melinda's silence and trauma, and it is overcome by her bravery.

When Melinda first starts using the closet as an escape, she is in a very bad place. As a result of the trauma of being raped she has trouble speaking or interacting with other people. She attempts to use it as a place she can go to avoid interaction with others-she tries to go there to escape going to a pep rally, for example. She also becomes very comfortable in the closet-she decorates it and becomes very familiar with it. This shows how she had become used to shutting herself away. She is comfortable with her lack of interaction with others, and she finds it a relief to be alone.

However, things start to change for Melinda. Towards the end of the year, she starts to talk a little more-to her art teacher and lab partner mostly. As she does this, she becomes more comfortable with communication and she starts to spend less and less time in her closet. At the end of the year, she starts to clean it out "in case another kid needs it next year". This shows that she found it to be a helpful escape, and she was glad to have it and she hopes to pass it on to someone else. It also shows that she is done hiding and is ready to speak again. Melinda also confronts her past in there. At the end, Andy catches her in the closet. He attempts to attack her, but she fights back, something she has been unable to do throughout the book. She tells him "I said no" which proves that her strength has grown since the beginning of the year.

The closet shows Melinda's journey throughout the book. At first, she is silent and shuts herself away from the world but when she starts to communicate with people, she does not need to hide anymore. Melinda leaves behind the closet when she leaves behind the part of her life that caused her so much difficulty.

The Scarlet Letter

In The Scarlet Letter, one of the most important symbols is Pearl, Hester and Dimmesdale’s child. Pearl is complicated-she is a physical symbol of Hester’s sin, so she often seems evil or unnatural, but she is also a symbol of love and positive things in Hester’s life, despite how she was created. Pearl is a reminder of something terrible for Hester, but she is also a source of joy.

Pearl is a very complicated character-although she is Hester’s child, Hester does not always think of her that way. There are many scenes where Hester thinks of her as a “demon child”, or is frightened by her. For example, when Hester tries to teach Pearl about God she proclaims “I have no heavenly father!”, horrifying Hester and making her believe that her daughter may really be a demon. Because of how she was conceived, it is hard for Hester to think of Pearl as a real child. Pearl is also the personification of Hester’s sin-she was created through the adultery, and serves as a constant reminder of the sin. Throughout the book, Pearl is constantly with Hester, reminding her and everyone around them of her sin. When they are walking throughout town, a child calls out “There is the likeness of the scarlet letter!” referring to Pearl. Also, Pearl always focuses on the letter-it says that as a baby, she chose to grab at it constantly, and when they are in the forest with Dimmesdale, she is afraid of Hester and does not recognize her when she takes it off. Pearl is the physical representation of Hester’s adultery, which makes it hard for Hester to think of her as a pure child.

Although she represents many negative things, Pearl is also a symbol for many good things in Hester’s life-love, passion, and beauty. She is described as having “rich and luxuriant beauty; a beauty that shone with deep and vivid tints; a bright complexion, eyes possessing intensity both of depth and glow, and hair already of a deep, glossy brown and which, in after years, would be nearly akin to black.” For her personality, she is described as intelligent, brave, imaginative, and passionate. Clearly she is shown as a beautiful, desirable creature and not necessarily a realistic portrayal of a child. Hester loves Pearl deeply, and it is shown through her care and treatment of her daughter. She says at one point “My daughter is my happiness,” and she is also terrified when she thinks she might lose custody of Hester. Another part of her symbolism is her name, Pearl. A pearl is created when sand, dirt, and grit combine together under extreme pressure to create something beautiful. Pearl, who is a talented and beautiful child, came out of the sin that Hester and Dimmesdale committed. Pearl represents brightness and love as well as the sin.

Pearl is extremely complicated character and symbol. She is the physical representation of Hester’s sin and adultery, but she is also a symbol of brightness and love that came out of something terrible.

Banned Books Essay

Addie Lovell

808

Dear Ms. Berner,

I am aware that one of the biggest controversies between schools and parents is the fight over whether or not books should be banned for mature or disturbing content that could be harmful for a child to see.  I know that some people, mostly parents, believe that kids should not be exposed to some of the things in books and therefore want the school board to remove them from school libraries. However, many others believe these books teach kids important messages about the world, and that they can be good for kids to relate to. I believe that students should have access to all books, no matter how controversial or disturbing they may be.

The first reason that all books should be able to be read by students is because the books with the dark issues are the ones that teach young people about serious issues in the world. For example, a book that was banned in many schools was Speak, by Laurie Halse Anderson, because it featured rape. I think that banning this book does not help shelter kids from the issues, but rather avoid the issues completely. Students need to be educated about the topics that books show, because in their life their life, they may someday face them, or see them in the world. In "Nerd Alert: banning books is stupid... And still happening in the US" it says "banning books will not make the problems go away". The dark issues books still exist, and sheltering kids from them is just pretending they don’t happen. All it does is give kids the false idea that there are no problems like violence, abuse, and mental illness in the world. Also, in "Has young adult fiction become too dark?" by Mary Elizabeth Williams, it quotes "Darkness isn't the enemy of the truth, but ignorance always is." Ignoring dark issues and pretending they don't exist is much more problematic than teaching kids about serious topics. If kids are not taught about the dark issues in the world, all it will do is keep them in the dark about worldwide problems that affect many people, and that need to be solved.

Another reason books shouldn't be banned is because they are easy for teens to relate to and they make them understand that they are not alone. Many banned books deal with issues like abuse, self harm, bullying and other issues that teenagers have to face. If they can see that other people have gone through these things they will feel better about themselves and their situation. In books, teenagers can see that whatever hard things they are facing are widespread issues, and other people have had to deal with the same problems, which will help them out a lot. In “Yes, Teen fiction can be dark, but it shows teenagers they are not alone”, by Maureen Johnson, she quotes “If subjects like these are in YA books, it’s to show they are real, they have happened to others, and they can be survived. For teenagers, there is sometimes no more critical message then: You are not alone.” Teenagers who have had to deal with hard experiences often need validation that it is normal to feel the way they do, and they can find that in books. Books show teens that things that they have had to go through (like self harm, depression, or traumatic experiences like rape or abuse), are things other people have experienced, and things that they will be able to recover from.

Some people believe that books should be banned because the issues that the they teach about are too heavy for students to understand. However, the issues are real and cannot be ignored just because they may upset some people. In "The Bane of Banned Books" Bill Moyers quotes "Censorship is the enemy of the truth," which means for pretending issues don't exist destroy the truth that they are real, and hard for people to deal with. Also, you could put "trigger warnings” on books to make sure they aren't read by students who can’t handle the content. Certain kids may have a hard time handling the issues books, but they can choose not to read them for themselves in that is the case. Some people worry that if kids read about dark issues, they will get involved with them. Mary Elizabeth Williams said "You can read books without the coming what you read about." They aren’t going to start to get involved with issues in books just because they read about them, and most book teach kids not to get into the problems that the book focuses on. Kids who read about drugs won't get addicted, but it introduces them to the seriousness of the issue. Books should not be banned because they have dark issues.

In conclusion, books should never be censored or banned from schools. They teach kids about issues that are important in the world, and help them feel like they're not alone if they are going through a hard time. Parents may think that they should “protect” their children from heavy issues, but books are able to introduce those issues to kids and help them learn about and understand them. Issues in books can be hard to read about or handle, but eventually they will become very beneficial to learning about issues in the world, and will teach young people important lessons.